Regardes son film America freedom to fascism et ensuite demandes toi si c'est qu'il dénonce est vrai ou faux ça te donnera un ordre d'idée sur la crédibilité du personnage.

Si Aaron Russo était crédible, tu ne crois pas qu'il aurait une notoriété qui dépasserait le Libertarian Party ?

Genre aux états-unis il n'y a pas de loi qui oblige à payer les impots sur le revenu mais si tu les payes pas tu vas en taule.

HS et faux :

Facts Refute Filmmaker’s Assertions on Income Tax in America

"The 16th Amendment repealed apportionment, but Mr. Russo says in the film that the 16th Amendment was never properly ratified and thus a tax on wages is unconstitutional. This claim has been made in various forms by thousands of tax protesters since 1913, and so far their batting average with the courts is .000.
To buttress the claim that the 16th Amendment is invalid, the film displays a quotation from a federal district judge, James C. Fox. But the transcript from which the judge’s words were taken shows that while he spoke those words, they were in the context of laying out issues and that the conclusion he reached was the opposite of the words quoted. Judge Fox, the transcript shows, concluded that no court would accept any argument that the 16th Amendment was not properly ratified and therefore invalid."

New York Times Article 2006 Prominent Tax Expert. http://www.nytimes.com/2006/07/31/movies/31russ.html?_r=2&oref=slogin&pagewanted=print&oref=slogin