And please also stop writing about "TIGCC/GCC4TI" everywhere, I'll collect my own data for TIGCC if I need it, thank you very much!

1) I'll keep writing TIGCC/GCC4TI, especially for things that may apply to both code bases. The compatibility between both code bases will stay good, certainly.
2) You don't collect your own data, or at least, you disregard the data (VTI support, etc.).

As for ./3... thanks for giving your opinion
But it's just that, an "opinion". Have you noticed the number of times you wrote "I" in ./3 ?
As The_One_Guy and Peter Fernandes (hypersonic) have mentioned on ticalc.org, as maeyhem has mentioned on the TIGCC/TICT message board, as we have mentioned countless times on yAronet, your opinion, my opinion, or the opinion of everyone else, is not the universal truth. There can be people who disagree, and act otherwise. Learn to live with that.

Just two things:
* as we discussed in another section of yAronet, the behaviour of the TIGCC IDEs wrt. compilation in a temp folder and non-saved files is definitely uncommon for IDEs and build systems. tprbuilder can be modified to check which files have changed and which haven't, in order to avoid rebuilding everything in some cases.
* in France, "format propriétaire" is often used for a format that is understood by a single tool / toolchain. TPR and the help system files belong to that definition.