Improving the buildability applies to both TIGCC and GCC4TI, but in case you hadn't noticed,
TIGCC's build scripts have at least two characteristics which make them, in their current state, less than satisfactory for packaging (and therefore, making releases on a regular basis...):
* they compile and install at the same time (a common practice with make, ant, mvn and other build systems is to separate those goals);* they install under /usr/local/tigcc, instead of a more standard prefix such as /usr/share/tigcc.
only mentioned
TIGCC's build scripts (specifically, what's wrong with the current state of them).
Let's also mention that GCC4TI's Windows installer
defaults to installing in "C:\Program Files[b]GCC4TI[/b]". Of course, users are free to install GCC4TI over TIGCC, just as they're free to install TIGCC over GCC4TI.
I know you can do better, more constructive posts than
./2 