Remember, collaboration and meritocracy is how I became a member of TICT: after multiple idea and code contributions of mine to TICT projects, Tom asked me whether I wanted to became a member.
If we didn't apply it in TIGCC, it's not our fault, sorry
We've already written many times that we got soooo tired up by most of our ideas and wished being rejected as a whole by you, the sole remaining member of TIGCC, that we gave up. When you announced completely irrealistic todo list items (on which you have made zero progress, more than one year and a month later, and counting !) while there are much more pressing issues on TIGCC (on a side note, hardly any of those have been tackled by you - of your six commits in TIGCC since January 2009, four are GCC4TI backports that tackle some of them, and the two others are trivialities), we said "let's do something together".
That's what we did, and we left you alone in the dust.
If it wasn't enough, several months later, you've tried to turn TIEmu and TILP into a dictatorship (by flat out refusing to cooperate with someone who went in through meritocracy), thereby negating all of Julien's and Romain's good work and good relationship towards the community - and added yourself a lot of workload and unneeded work by forking them. Good job.
All of this we've already written on other occasions, BTW, but you keep tirelessly spitting the same old crap...
Oh, BTW: you still haven't replied to a question I've already asked you twice before this one:
What are you exactly trying to do with this kind of statements, Kevin ? Pissing us off so we moderate your posts or even ban you from this board ? No way, sorry
I thought it was incorrect to ignore questions, requests posted by moderators (well, at least, I think so, all the more you hate it on the dead TIGCC/TICT board, when someone doesn't reply to you) ?