The company received more than 300 responses and most of them were eerily similar.
“It was abundantly clear it was [artificial intelligence],” Matt Wallaert, Oceans’ chief experience officer, said of the repeated answers, which also followed the same structure. It was like “you did the laziest possible … you failed the basic task of sharing your personal beliefs.”
The situation left Wallaert and the hiring team bewildered on how to evaluate the candidates, as even some of the most qualified blended together.
On critique les recruteurs, mais il faut reconnaître que ceux-là ont fait l'effort d'imaginer une question stupide originale, au lieu de se contenter du classique "citez-moi vos défauts".
Et comme visiblement ils n'aiment pas l'IA, je suis sûr qu'ils n'en ont pas non plus utilisé pour évaluer les candidats. N'est-ce pas ?