34Fermer36
Lionel DebrouxLe 13/05/2007 à 10:03
Abstract de l'analyse des chercheurs de Princeton sur les super machines Diebold, vers laquelle Mr Zlu a posté un lien plus direct que le mien:
Analysis of the machine, in light of real election procedures, shows that it is vulnerable to extremely serious attacks. For example, an attacker who gets physical access to a machine or its removable memory card for as little as one minute could install malicious code; malicious code on a machine could steal votes undetectably, modifying all records, logs, and counters to be consistent with the fraudulent vote count it creates. An attacker could also create malicious code that spreads automatically and silently from machine to machine during normal election activities — a voting-machine virus. We have constructed working demonstrations of these attacks in our lab.

./28: c'est sûr que le _test_ est un moyen acceptable de vérifier la sécurité d'un système traditionnellement appelé "critique" (une machine à voter en fait partie)...