12Fermer
Lionel DebrouxLe 05/01/2009 à 14:16
Well, isn't it clear that ./2 , especially the last paragraph, expresses strong doubt about you sabotaging the infrastructure ?

But it's a fact we envisioned the *possibility* of you sabotaging the infrastructure, though we knew it was VERY unlikely. As you wrote yourself in ./12, it's the kind of PR storm that nobody wants to trigger, not to mention it's illegal and ineffective.

Why on earth did we envision this possibility ? Simple smile
Your despise against us, our goals and our work ("votre mailing list pourrie", etc.).
Your threat to sabotage the code, mentioned in ./2.
Your sabotaging of the Microsoft Wikipedia article ( http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Microsoft&diff=prev&oldid=63166346 , edit made by the same IP that is the main editor of the TIGCC page...), showing how constructive you can be when you don't like something or somebody else.
Et caetera.