12Fermer14
PpHdLe 21/09/2009 à 07:05
dietsche (./12) :

I actually meant dropping old AMS support entirely. But I didn't know that PedroM needs older AMS support.... so maybe it isn't a great idea to drop support smile.gif The main idea was to simplify the framework and make maintenance easier.


I don't think it will really simplify the maintenance: most of the times, it simply says that the function N is not available for AMS older than M.0m Moreover we are obbliged to keep this infrastructure due to the difference between 89, 92+ and V200/89 Titanium.
Avoiding the tigcclib hacks for old AMS can simplify it.
Morover some users may prefer older AMS versions than the latest ones which were slighty faster, or offer more archive memory smile