It's a fact that TIGCC development used to be even more closed before you created the CVS repository... but I didn't even mention that, because TIGCC is not open:

For 0.96, I did all the development in the open.

Yeah, sure. Tell that to a dead horse and get a beating...
The todo list and the bug list have always been closed, as I already wrote in ./3. Yet you keep repeating a blatant lie. Yes, you're a liar, because your claim has been disproved by facts for years. Mostly everyone in the TI-68k community knows that.

And you manage to repeat your lie less than 48 hours after originally posting it in this very topic, and getting a fact-based rebuttal of your stupid claim... Obviously, you aren't a reasonable person.
Initially, before reading that gem in your post, I thought I would spend, once again, several dozens of minutes commenting on most paragraphs of ./9 (starting with the first one about upgrading kernel support - it's your right to disagree, but we've already posted a rebuttal of your paragraph many times). But now that it's clear that you're into sheer irrationality (blatantly ignoring facts + posing your lies as the truth), I won't waste my time replying to ./9.
Feel free to keep polluting this topic of the GCC4TI board.