I didn't bother wasting time replying to the previous round of personal attacks and provocations... but you're now piling more and further derailing the topic. How unsurprising and disappointing...

I won't edit or lock your post, though.

My summary

First pass on splitting gcc-4.1-tigcc-patch constituents (needs more work):

and footer

qit / svn blame is unhelpful, need to look up in the Changelog and commit history...

preceded by

I once spent a couple hours partitioning the GCC patch

should have been a clear indication to you that the list was a first step. It was more than enough for the purpose of estimating the number of changes lumped together in a single patch (yes, I have known for many years that basically all of those are necessary). I had the feeling that it was at least 20 changes, now I have a rough number (which is in that range, BTW).
The purpose was obviously not to do a thorough job of splitting the patch down to each individual hunk (for that purpose, as I wrote, I knew it was needed to spend more time than just a couple hours, and to look in the Changelog and commit history), which was unnecessary for this discussion anyway.

But as usual, you're missing the point, and as usual (in the 12 or so past years), you're sending multiple attacks against people. This thread was posted at a time you were banned for bad behaviour, which is a good reason why you couldn't reply to it...
If I had bothered you for such a simple task as estimating the amount of mixing in your patch (as shown above, I clearly didn't need to), you'd have attacked me for being so incompetent that I cannot even do such simple tasks...