Fomenko claims

1. That different accounts of the same historical events are often 'assigned' different dates and locations by historians and translators, creating multiple "phantom copies" of these events; these "phantom copies" are often misdated by centuries or even millennia;
2. That all these events, actual and fictional alike, end up incorporated into conventional chronology;
3. That, as a consequence, the chronology universally taken for granted is simply wrong, and it mainly repeats events from 900 AD onwards;
4. That this chronology was essentially invented in the 16th and 17th centuries;
5. That archaeological dating, dendrochronological dating, paleographical dating, carbon dating, and other methods of dating of ancient sources and artifacts known today are erroneous, non-exact or dependent on traditional chronology;
6. That there is not a single document in existence that can be reliably dated earlier than the 11th century;
7. That Ancient Rome, Greece and Egypt were crafted during the Renaissance by humanists and clergy;
8. That the Old Testament is probably a rendition of events that occurred in the Middle Ages, and that the New Testament is actually older than the Old Testament;
9. That currently accepted chronology has many inconsistences, but these are generally overlooked and ignored, giving the perception that there are no problems;
10. That Egyptian horoscopes give dates of 1000 AD and up to as late as 1700 AD;
11. That the Book of Revelation we know of contains a horoscope that is dated to 25 September - 10 October 1486 AD compiled by cabbalist Johannes Reuchlin.
12. That the horoscopes contained in Shumerian/Babilonian tablets have solution every 30-50 yrs on the time axis therefore useless for dating.
13. That the Chinese tables of eclipses are useless for dating as they contain too many eclipses that did not take place.