Réseaux neuronaux et créativité - Page 28

Zeph (./814) :
C'est peut-être vrai au pied de la lettre, à savoir qu'ils ne font plus que de la revue de code et demandent à leur agent IA de corriger ce qui ne va pas. Ça fonctionne à force d'itérations, en revanche je ne suis pas convaincu que ce soit vraiment un gain de temps si tu veux arriver au même résultat.

Si quelque chose d'à peu près correct te convient en revanche, c'est sûr que c'est très rapide.

Bill Oliver, a Progressive Conservative Party member of the legislative assembly of New Brunswick, noted in a speech last month that “One of the dangers associated with creating advocacy offices is that citizens often develop expectations that exceed the powers actually granted to those offices.” He then went on to say out loud that “here’s a more natural, flowing version of that section that reads like a legislative speech rather than a series of short points,” a line with all the hallmarks of an LLM presenting an alternative style option in response to a prompt.

This font looks perfectly normal to humans but wreaks havoc on AI
Fast Company

A new “AI-proof” font was designed to be hard for AI agents to scrape, but you can’t tell by just looking at it. Unlike other anti-AI fonts that use letters that are difficult for bots to read, ShieldFont swaps out words behind the scenes to poison the data that automated scrapers take without permission.

ShieldFont was designed as part of a project created by a group of professionals including the Brazilian creative studio Seneda & Abrucio and the Danish type foundry PlayType. It shields text from large language models (LLMs) by garbling sentences in the HTML source code, leaving automated scrapers to sift through sentences filled with decoy words that make a sentence incoherent. Thanks to a custom font on a backend, though, the real text is displayed for a human reader to see.

flanker (./834) :
Avec les LLM, ça sera beaucoup plus compliqué de distinguer la pub d'un résultat de recherche « sincère »

Amazon will train on Twitch streamers' content by default, unless they opt out | TechCrunchTechCrunch"If this was opt-in, nobody would opt in," Twitch CPO Mike Minton said on a livestream responding to user feedback. "That's honestly the answer."

The streaming platform Twitch will now use creators’ content to help train generative AI models for its parent company, Amazon. This move has inspired swift and concentrated backlash from the Twitch community, especially because creators are opted in to having their content used for this AI training by default.

(...)

“Why is it not opt-in? That’s what everybody is spamming in chat. I get it. ‘Let me opt in versus making me opt out,’” Minton said. “Well, there’s an honest answer… If this was opt-in, nobody would opt in. That’s honestly the answer.”