Pen^2 (./58230) :Cet article pue méchamment du cul, pour des raisons évoquées en long et en large dans les commentaires. Perso je n'étais pas au courant que l'avion était si polluant. Je pensais que c'était marginal comparé au nombre de voitures, bus etc. Mais là je vais y réfléchir à deux fois. Avec mes vols Japon- Suisse tous les ans je suis de toute façon mal parti.
C'est sûr que si tu prends le cas le plus défavorable contre le cas le plus favorable(quelques chiffres, évidemment c'est rapporté au nombre de kilomètres parcourus ^^)Contrairement aux idées reçues, l'avion pollue souvent moins que la voiture...La RSE et le développement durable en entreprise : e-RSE.netArrêtez de blâmer le transport aérien pour le réchauffement climatique : il est souvent moins polluant que la voiture à distances équivalentes...
Mais même avec ton exemple, ça pose d'autres problèmes : encombrement local des routes, etc.
(genre la course après un burrito)
« Le message envoyé aux sources c'est "où que vous soyez, on vous trouvera" »
— Loopsider (@Loopsidernews) May 15, 2019
Pour avoir révélé que des armes vendues par la France étaient utilisées par l'Arabie saoudite au Yémen, @GeoffreyLivolsi a été arrêté par la DGSI. Il dénonce une atteinte à la liberté de la presse. pic.twitter.com/vU8YcIiXdE
)
Le niveau monte. Editions de "Martine dans la forêt" : l'une de 1987 en haut, l'autre de 2016 en bas. pic.twitter.com/MZzx5V3kU5
— JOD (@jo_delb) May 15, 2019
)I can’t believe what I’m seeing! While running a facial recognition pilot, one man (understandably imho) covered himself up. The police forced him to show his face (& then fined him for disorderly conduct). This is dangerous & terrifying. pic.twitter.com/QdG2VPGyfE
— Jamie Bartlett (@JamieJBartlett) May 15, 2019
Next, we have cohort studies that compared autism rates between children who did and did not receive the vaccine being stuided. This is one of the most powerful experimental designs, and these studies were particularly large (Hviid et al. 2019 [657,461 children]; Madsen et al. 2002 [440,654 children]; Anders et al. 2004 [109,863 children]; and Jain et al. 2015 95,727 children]). Take another look at those sample sizes, they are enormous (far larger than any of the anti-vaccine studies), but once again, they did not find any significant differences between vaccinated and unvaccinated children....
Further, there is a meta-analysis with over 1.2 million children (Taylor et al. 2014) which also failed to find evidence of vaccines causing autism.
On the anti-vaccine side, I went through their lists of papers (here, here, and here; 160 papers total), and 33 of them weren’t actually about autism, 82 (over half) weren’t about vaccines, 41 were animal trials or in vitro studies (which are weak designs that have limited applicability to humans, especially for something like autism), 60 were on either a form of mercury that has never been in vaccines or thimerosal (which hasn’t been in childhood vaccines for almost two decades), 9 were case reports/conference abstracts/opinion papers/some other non-research paper, and 37 were non-systematic reviews (only 8 of which were relevant to the topic at hand; some papers were in multiple categories).
Only 14 of the papers were actually studies on humans that are relevant to autism and the current vaccine schedule, but none of those studies are large, all of them were association studies (i.e., they could not show causation, because correlation does not equal causation) and most of them were seriously flawed.
)